Laborers' Pension Fund et al v. GA Paving, LLC et al
Laborers' Pension Fund, Laborers' Welfare Fund of The Health and Welfare Department of The Constructtion and General Laborer's District Council of Chicago and Vicinity, The Chicago Laborers' District Council Retiree Health and Welfare Fund and James S. Jorgensen |
GA Paving, LLC, Power Paving Construction, Inc., George Angellilo and Antonio Cefalu |
1:2017cv00891 |
February 2, 2017 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Chicago Office |
Cook |
Robert M. Dow |
Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 57 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Signed by the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr. on 8/2/2018. For the reasons stated above, Defendants' motion 54 is granted in part and denied in part. Defendant Power Paving's motion to dismiss is denied. Plaintiffs may proceed with the claims in their complaint against Power Paving. Defendant Antonio Cefalu's motion to dismiss is granted. Plaintiffs' fraud claim agai nst Cefalu is dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiffs are given until September 4, 2018 to file an amended complaint against Defendant Cefalu consistent with this opinion if they choose to do so. This case is set for further status hearing on September 12, 2018 at 9:00 a.m. Mailed notice(cdh, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.