MAO-MSO RECOVERY II, LLC et al v. Allstate Insurance Company et al
| MAO-MSO RECOVERY II, LLC, MSP RECOVERY, LLC and MSPA CLAIMS 1, LLC |
| Allstate Insurance Company and Esurance Property and Casualty Insurance Company |
| 1:2017cv01340 |
| February 21, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| XX US, Outside the State of IL |
| Andrea R. Wood |
| Medicare Act |
| Civil Miscellaneous Case |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
111
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order signed by the Honorable Andrea R. Wood on 9/11/2019. Mailed notice (aw,)
|
|
Filing
62
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint 31 is granted and Defendants' Alternative Motion to Dismiss or Strike Class Allegations 33 is denied as moot. Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint is dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiffs shall have until 4/20/2018 to file an amended complaint addressing the deficiencies discussed in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion. If Plai ntiffs do not file an amended complaint by that date, the case will be dismissed with prejudice. Status hearing previously set for 4/11/2018 is stricken and reset for 4/26/2018 at 9:00 AM. Signed by the Honorable Andrea R. Wood on 3/30/2018. Mailed notice (td, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
