Pittsfield Development LLC et al v. City Of Chicago
Pittsfield Development LLC, Pittsfield Residential II LLC and Pittsfield Hotel Holdings, LLC |
City Of Chicago |
1:2017cv01951 |
March 13, 2017 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Chicago Office |
Cook |
Charles P. Kocoras |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 226 MEMORANDUM OPINION Signed by the Honorable Charles P. Kocoras on 2/13/2024. Mailed notice (ags, ) |
Filing 54 MEMORANDUM Opinion: The City's motion to reconsider is denied. The City's 12(b)(6) motion is denied. It is so ordered. Signed by the Honorable Charles P. Kocoras on 3/12/2019. Status hearing set for 4/4/2019 at 9:30 AM. Mailed notice(vcf, ) |
Filing 20 MEMORANDUM Opinion: The City's Motion 11 is granted in part and denied in part. Counts IV, V, and VI are dismissed, as are the procedural due process and equal protection components of Counts I, II, and III. Residentials and Development 's takings claims as pleaded in Counts I, II, and III are also dismissed. The City's Motion is denied, however, with respect to the takings claims attached to Hotel's interest in floors 29 and Hotel's interest in the Permit, as articulated in Pittsfield's first three counts. Counts I, II, and III's substantive due process claims survive the Motion, as well. It is so ordered. Status hearing set for 12/12/2017 at 9:30 AM. Signed by the Honorable Charles P. Kocoras on 11/28/2017. Mailed notice(vcf, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.