Kibbons, Jr. v. Double Jack Properties, LLC et al
| William Kibbons, Jr. |
| Double Jack Properties, LLC and Carl Strumillo |
| 1:2017cv03017 |
| April 21, 2017 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Cook |
| Samuel Der-Yeghiayan |
| Employment |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 2 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
110
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order signed by the Honorable Edmond E. Chang. For the reasons stated in the Opinion, the respective cross-motions 84 87 for summary judgment are both denied. The status hearing of 04/30/2020 remains in place, but if the pa rties want another settlement referral (which the Court strongly encourages), then they should email the courtroom deputy by 04/23/2020. Otherwise, the parties shall file a status report by 04/23/2020, stating (1) whether they want a jury or a bench trial; and (2) the anticipated length of any trial (including jury selection, jury addresses, and jury deliberations) and possible trial weeks that the parties and witnesses are available. Mailed notice (mw, )
|
|
Filing
19
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order signed by the Honorable Samuel Der-Yeghiayan on 11/14/2017: This matter is before the court on Defendants' motion to dismiss. For the reasons stated below, the motion to dismiss is denied. Mailed notice (ags, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
