Magnetek, Inc. v. The Travelers Indemnity Company et al
| Magnetek, Inc. |
| The Travelers Indemnity Company and The Travelers Casualty and Surety Company |
| 1:2017cv03173 |
| April 27, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| XX US, Outside the State of IL |
| Robert W. Gettleman |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
104
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: For the reasons stated in the court's Memorandum Opinion and Order, the court grants plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment [Doc. 68 ] and denies Travelers' motion for summary judgment [Doc. [8 5]]. The court thus holds that: (a) Travelers has a duty to defend plaintiff Magnetek in the Monsanto Litigation; (b) Magnatek may control its defense in that litigation; and (c) Travelers shall reimburse Magnetek for defense costs, past and future , in that litigation. The court also grants plaintiff's motion to file an amended complaint nunc pro tunc [Doc. 93 ]. This matter remains set for a hearing to report on status on 8/28/2019 at 9:10 a.m. Signed by the Honorable Robert W. Gettleman on 7/11/2019. Mailed notice (cn).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
