Thomas v. Dart et al
Marvin Thomas |
Tom J. Dart, Cook of County, Unknown Correctional Officers and Unknown Medical Personnel |
1:2017cv04233 |
June 5, 2017 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Chicago Office |
Cook |
Samuel Der-Yeghiayan |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 197 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 173) is denied and Defendant's motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 174) is granted. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of Defendant Cook County Sheriff Thomas Dart. Civil case terminated. Signed by the Honorable Mary M. Rowland on 7/14/2021. (See attached Order for further detail.)Mailed notice. (dm, ) |
Filing 76 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order signed by the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 4/30/2019. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss [Dkt. 58] is granted as to Thomas's Rehabilitation Act and Section 1983 claims against Sheriff Dart, and denied as to the ADA claim against Sheriff Dart. Thomas may proceed on his ADA claim within the contours stated in this Order. Mailed notice(lk, ) |
Filing 42 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order signed by the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 8/22/2018. The Court grants Defendants' Motion to Dismiss 31 . Plaintiff's Complaint is dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff must file an amended pleading by 9/4/2018. Mailed notice(lk, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.