United States of America for use and benefit of A&C Construction & Installation, Co. WLL v. Zurich American Insurance Company et al

Justia Dockets & Filings Seventh Circuit Illinois Northern District United States of America for use and benefit of A&C Construction & Installation, Co. WLL v. Zurich American Insurance Company et al

United States of America for use and benefit of A&C Construction & Installation, Co. WLL v. Zurich American Insurance Company et al

Plaintiff:	United States of America for use and benefit of A&C Construction & Installation, Co. WLL
Defendant:	Zurich American Insurance Company and The Insurance Company of Pennsylvania
Case Number:	1:2017cv04307
Filed:	June 7, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Office:	Chicago Office
County:	Cook
Presiding Judge:	Harry D. Leinenweber
Nature of Suit:	Miller Act
Cause of Action:	Miller Act
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 27, 2019	Filing 132 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order. For the reasons stated herein, Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 104) is granted. Civil case terminated. Signed by the Honorable Harry D. Leinenweber on 8/27/2019: Mailed notice(maf)
January 15, 2019	Filing 94 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: For the reasons stated herein, the Court rules as follows: Plaintiff's Motion to Strike #81 is granted as to Affirmative Defense Nos. 1, 3, 4, 5 and 8, and denied as to Affirmative Defense Nos. 2, 6 and 7. D efendants' Motion to Compel the Rule 30(b)(6) deposition of Jean Louis Cardahi #44 is granted. The Court orders Plaintiff to produce for deposition Jean Louis Cardahi in Chicago (or other agreeable location) by the end of February 2019, or if fo r some reason Cardahi is not available by that date, Plaintiff is to produce some other qualified 30(b)(6) witness in Chicago on or by 2/28/19. Defendants' Motion to Require Plaintiff to Comply with Rule 34 #83 is granted, and Plaintiff is order ed to organize and label documents in the supplemental production in the categories set forth in the production request. Finally, the Court notes that this case has been pending for almost two years without the parties even starting depositions. The parties are ordered to get together and move the case forward, hopefully without further interference by the Court. Status hearing set for 2/5/19 at 9:00 a.m. Signed by the Honorable Harry D. Leinenweber on 1/15/2019: Mailed notice (maf)

Date Filed

Document Text

August 27, 2019

Filing 132 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order. For the reasons stated herein, Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 104) is granted. Civil case terminated. Signed by the Honorable Harry D. Leinenweber on 8/27/2019: Mailed notice(maf)

January 15, 2019

Filing 94 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: For the reasons stated herein, the Court rules as follows: Plaintiff's Motion to Strike #81 is granted as to Affirmative Defense Nos. 1, 3, 4, 5 and 8, and denied as to Affirmative Defense Nos. 2, 6 and 7. D efendants' Motion to Compel the Rule 30(b)(6) deposition of Jean Louis Cardahi #44 is granted. The Court orders Plaintiff to produce for deposition Jean Louis Cardahi in Chicago (or other agreeable location) by the end of February 2019, or if fo r some reason Cardahi is not available by that date, Plaintiff is to produce some other qualified 30(b)(6) witness in Chicago on or by 2/28/19. Defendants' Motion to Require Plaintiff to Comply with Rule 34 #83 is granted, and Plaintiff is order ed to organize and label documents in the supplemental production in the categories set forth in the production request. Finally, the Court notes that this case has been pending for almost two years without the parties even starting depositions. The parties are ordered to get together and move the case forward, hopefully without further interference by the Court. Status hearing set for 2/5/19 at 9:00 a.m. Signed by the Honorable Harry D. Leinenweber on 1/15/2019: Mailed notice (maf)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States of America for use and benefit of A&C Construction & Installation, Co. WLL v. Zurich American Insurance Company et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States of America for use and benefit of A&C Construction & Installation, Co. WLL
Represented By:	Raymond Marion Krauze
Represented By:	Abram Isaac Moore
Represented By:	Justin L. Weisberg
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Zurich American Insurance Company
Represented By:	Colin P. Smith
Represented By:	Robert Edwin Tonn
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: The Insurance Company of Pennsylvania
Represented By:	Colin P. Smith
Represented By:	Robert Edwin Tonn
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?