Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Crowe Horwath LLP
| Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation |
| Crowe Horwath LLP |
| 1:2017cv04384 |
| June 9, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Cook |
| Edmond E. Chang |
| Banks and Banking |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1396 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
113
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order signed by the Honorable Edmond E. Chang on 6/25/2018: For the reasons discussed in the Opinion, Crowe's motion to compel 73 is granted in part and denied in part. 1. By 07/23/2018, the FDIC-R (and/or FDIC-C) must c onduct a relevancy review and identify and produce all documents authored by, or sent to or from Shirley Langford, Leslee Martin, and Jon Peterson, on the topics detailed in the Opinion. 2. By 07/23/2018, the FDIC-R must conduct a relevancy review of every document it obtained from a third-party during its pre-litigation investigation, excepting documents obtained from third-parties who have already produced or have agreed to produce all requested documents in response to Crowe's third-part y subpoenas. The details of the review and the deadline are subject to conferral between the FDIC-R and Crowe. 3. By 06/29/2018, the FDIC-R shall upload the unredacted deposition transcripts and the transcript of Owens' deposition under seal and ex parte, and highlight in yellow the parts that were redacted so the Court can conduct an in camera review. 4. By 07/13/2018, the FDIC-R shall file, under seal and ex parte, the settlement negotiations and communications leading up to the two settl ement agreements that have been provided to Crowe. 5. By 07/16/2018, the FDIC-R shall to produce to Crowe communications and documents related to potential claims against third parties that are not related to settlement, negotiations, or compromise t o the extent they exist, unless the FDIC-R believes that the records are protected by another privilege, in which case the FDIC-R must provide a privilege log to Crowe by the same deadline. In order to allow the parties to review this Opinion and confer as necessary, the status hearing of 06/25/2018 is reset to 07/10/2018 at 10:30 a.m. Again, any counsel may participate by phone; notify the courtroom deputy by 2 p.m. of the prior business day. Emailed notice(eec)
|
|
Filing
72
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order signed by the Honorable Edmond E. Chang on 3/27/2018: For the reasons stated in the Opinion, Defendant's motion to dismiss and to strike is granted in part and denied in part 17 . The jury demand and the request for punitive damages stand; Count 2 (the negligence claims) is dismissed as duplicative of the accounting malpractice claim; and Count 3 (the negligent misrepresentation claim) remains intact for now. The Court encourages the parties to engage in settlement negotiations if this Opinion makes a difference to the parties' settlement positions. The status hearing of 05/10/2018 remains in place. Emailed notice,(Chang, Edmond)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
