United States of America vs. The State of Illinois
| 1:2017cv04457 |
| September 14, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Qui Tam (31 U.S.C. § 3729(a)) |
| 31 U.S.C. ยง 3729 False Claims Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
97
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: For the reasons stated herein, Defendants' Motions to Dismiss (Dkt. Nos. 78, 81) are granted. The Second Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 75) is dismissed with prejudice, except that Counts IIII are dismissed without prejudice as to the United States. Civil case terminated. Signed by the Honorable Harry D. Leinenweber on 8/2/2021:Mailed notice(maf)
|
|
Filing
74
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: For the reasons stated herein, the Court grants Defendants' Motions to Dismiss 58 & 61 . Relators' Amended Complaint 48 is dismissed without prejudice. Relators have leave to amend by 10/14/20. Failure to do so will convert the Court's Order from one without prejudice to one with prejudice. Signed by the Honorable Harry D. Leinenweber on 9/14/2020:Mailed notice(maf)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: United States of America vs. The State of Illinois | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
