Robert Berg v. Akorn, Inc. et al
| Robert Berg |
| Akorn, Inc., John N. Kapoor, Kenneth S. Abramowitz, Adrienne L. Graves, Ronald M. Johnson, Steven J. Meyer, Terry A. Rappuhn, Brian Tambi, Alan Weinstein, Raj Rai, Fresenius Kabi AG and Quercus Acquisition, Inc. |
| 1:2017cv05016 |
| July 6, 2017 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| XX US, Outside the State of IL |
| Thomas M. Durkin |
| Stockholders Suits |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 78 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
141
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: For the reasons stated in the attached order, Frank's motion 129 is granted. The Court orders further briefing on the propriety of additional sanctions. Each Plaintiffs' attorney implicated in these cases is permitted a brief of not more than ten pages, due by 4/21/2025. Frank is permitted a reply brief of no more than 20 pages, due by 5/5/2025. Signed by the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 3/10/2025. Mailed notice. (ecw, )
|
|
Filing
81
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: For these reasons, Frank's motions to intervene, R. 57 ; R. 66 , and to consolidate, R. 67 , are denied without prejudice. Because the parties' briefs on Frank's motion to intervene were focused on the Court's subject matter jurisdiction and contributed little to the Court's understanding of Frank's potential interest in this case; and because the Court is concerned with Berg's apparent success in evading the requirements of Ru le 23, and takes seriously Frank's contention that this case, although brought in the name of Akorn's shareholders, actually serves to injure their interests (if only derivatively); Frank is granted leave to refile his motion to intervene ( and motion to consolidate) by December 8, 2017. Should Frank refile his motion, it should focus on the issues identified by the Court in this opinion regarding his interest in this case generally. Should Frank refile his motion, Berg's oppositio n is due December 22, 2017, and Frank's reply is due January 8, 2018. If Frank does not file a motion by December 8, 2017, the Court will consider the case closed.The 11/27/2017 status date is vacated. Signed by the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 11/21/2017:Mailed notice(srn, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
