DeSimone v. Danaher Corporation et al
| Ronald DeSimone |
| Danaher Corporation, X-Rite Pantone, Leica Biosystems and Videojet Technologies, Inc. |
| 1:2017cv05232 |
| July 14, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Lake |
| Robert M. Dow |
| Employment |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 754 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
123
PARTIAL JUDGMENT ORDER UNDER FRCP 54(b) Signed by the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr. on 8/6/2020. Mailed notice(cdh, )
|
|
Filing
93
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Signed by the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr. on 11/26/2019. For the reasons stated below, Defendants' motion to enforce settlement 85 is denied. This case is set for further status hearing on December 13, 2 019 at 9:30 a.m. The parties are directed to meet and confer and to file on the docket no later than December 10, 2019 a joint status report indicating (1) how they propose to proceed with the parallel Illinois and Michigan cases (i ncluding whether one will be stayed or dismissed) and (2) if they propose to proceed here in Illinois, a detailed plan for any further discovery and dispositive motions and whether they have mutual interest in trying to resume settlement discussions to avoid further litigation costs. Mailed notice(cdh, )
|
|
Filing
68
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Signed by the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr. on 8/31/2018. Before the Court is Defendants Leica Biosystems' and Videojet Technologies, Inc.'s motion 34 to enforce the parties' settlement agreement and to stay case deadlines. Also before the Court is Defendants' motion 64 to strike a portion of Peter Roeser's declaration. For the reasons that follow, Defendants motion 34 is granted in part and de nied in part. The Court denies Defendants' motion to enforce the settlement agreement; however, the Court grants Defendants' motion to the extent that Defendants seek to stay their obligation to answer the First Amended Complaint along with other case deadlines. Defendants' motion 64 to strike portions of Peter Roeser's declaration is granted in part and denied in part. As a housekeeping matter, De fendants' motion 32 for leave to file documents under seal is granted. The case is set for further status on September 7, 2018 at 10:00 a.m. to set an evidentiary hearing date for purposes of resolving certain disputed issues of fact relating to whether the parties entered into a binding settlement agreement. All other case deadlines are stayed until further order of the Court. Mailed notice(cdh, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
