Haag v. Cook County Adult Probation Department et al
| Maribel Haag |
| Cook County Adult Probation Department, Cook County, Delores M Johnson, Darryl Gray, Athenia Palmer, Noreen Larson, Lisa Stawczyk and Rahsaan Moore |
| 1:2017cv05403 |
| July 24, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Cook |
| Marvin E. Aspen |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
169
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order signed by the Honorable Edmond E. Chang. For the reasons stated in the Opinion, the Office of the Chief Judge's summary judgment motion 143 is granted; Cook County's motion 139 is terminated as unnecessary because it is only in the case for indemnification; and the case is dismissed in full. A separate AO-450 judgment will be entered. The tracking status hearing scheduled for 04/16/2021 is vacated. Civil case terminated. Emailed notice (mw, )
|
|
Filing
106
ORDER signed by the Honorable Edmond E. Chang. For the reasons stated in the Order, Plaintiff's motion 78 to reconsider is denied in part but granted in that the dismissal of the ADA retaliation claim is altered to a dismissal *without* preju dice, which allows Count Two of the Third Amended Complaint to stand. The motions 81 84 ti dismiss are granted. Specifically, the individual Defendants and the Cook County Adult Probation Department are dismissed from the case, and Cook County re mains in the case for indemnification only. All of the punitive and exemplary damages requests are struck, the liquidated damages requests are struck as to the Title VII and ADA claims, and the liquidated damages request under the ADEA remains intact . What remains is: Counts One through Nine of the Third Amended Complaint remain as to the Office of the Chief Judge only (and the Office of the Chief Judge may yet move to dismiss Count Two). Cook County remains in the case only for indemnification purposes. The ADEA claims (Counts Three and Four) include requests for liquidated damages. The status hearing of 04/25/2019 remains in place. The parties must confer before then and be ready to propose a discovery plan going forward. Emailed notice(slb, )
|
|
Filing
73
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order signed by the Honorable Edmond E. Chang. For the reasons stated in the Opinion, Count 2 (ADA retaliation), Count 10 (Section 1983), and Count 11 (Section 1981) are dismissed with prejudice as to the Office of the Chief Ju dge. Count 1 (ADA discrimination) is dismissed, but without prejudice to submitting a third amended complaint by 11/07/2018. All of the punitive and exemplary damages requests are struck; the liquidated damages requests are struck as to the Title VII and ADA claims (even if the ADA discrimination claim is successfully re-pled or the ADA retaliation claim is reinstated, liquidated damages are not permitted under the ADA); and the liquidated damages request under the ADEA remains intact. Emailed notice(slb, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
