Monroe v. Columbia College Chicago et al
| Vaun Monroe |
| Columbia College Chicago and Bruce Sheridan |
| 1:2017cv05837 |
| August 10, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| XX US, Outside the State of IL |
| Thomas M. Durkin |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
94
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 3/30/2020: The Court grants the Defendants' motion for summary judgment [R. 73 ]. Mailed notice (cn).
|
|
Filing
62
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: Defendants motion to dismiss Counts I through III, R. 52 , is granted. Signed by the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 8/27/2018:Mailed notice(srn, )
|
|
Filing
43
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: For the foregoing reasons, Defendant's motion to dismiss Counts I, II, and III, R. 14 , is granted without prejudice. If Plaintiff believes he can cure the deficiencies identified in this opinion, he may file a mo tion for leave to file an amended complaint on or before May 1, 2018. The motion should attach a redlined comparison between the current complaint and the proposed amended complaint, and it should be supported by a brief of no more than five pages describing how the proposed amended complaint cures the deficiencies in the current complaint. Signed by the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 4/10/2018:Mailed notice(srn, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
