Ruggles et al v. Annett Holdings, Inc. et al
| Ann Ruggles and Adrienne Femali |
| Annett Holdings, Inc., Patrick Brown and Eric Nuzbach |
| 1:2017cv05981 |
| August 16, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Du Page |
| Matthew F. Kennelly |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
71
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly on 1/3/2019: The Court grants the plaintiffs' petition for attorney fees and costs subject to the limitations set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion and Order. In total, the plaintiffs are entitled to $1,796.64 in expenses ($1,452.36 for Markoff Leinberger, LLC and $344.28 for Joyner) and compensation for 579.2 hours of work (401.8 for Markoff Leinberger, LLC and 177.4 for Joyner). Because the Court concludes that Leinberger and Markoff are entitled to hourly rates different from those they sought, and because it has no ready means of determining how many hours each attorney worked, the Court orders the plaintiffs to submit, by January 7, 2019, a report providing a calculation of the dollar amounts awardable for each attorney as set forth in this order. If the defendants believe the plaintiffs' calculation is incorrect, they must file a response explaining their contentions by January 10, 2019. (mk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
