Parker v. Dart, in his official capacity as Cook County Sheriff et al
| Tim Parker |
| Thomas J. Dart, Cook County and Joe Hurd |
| 1:2017cv06024 |
| August 17, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Cook |
| Elaine E. Bucklo |
| Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 451 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
64
ORDER: The defendants' partial motion to dismiss 54 is granted in part and denied in part. Parker's failure-to-accommodate claims brought under the ADA and ADAA in Count II are voluntarily dismissed. Parker's disability discriminat ion claim under the ADA/ADAA (Count III), sex discrimination claim under the Title VII (Count IV), and retaliation claim under Title VII and the ADA/ADAA (Count VII) are dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. The Court does not dismiss Parker's corresponding Rehabilitation Act claims set forth in Counts II, III, and VII. Parker's race and age discrimination claims (Counts V and VI) are dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrat ive remedies to the extent that they are based on discriminatory conduct other than the denial of Parker's grievances. Parker's defamation per se claim (Count IX) is dismissed with prejudice. Signed by the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman on 12/3/2018. Mailed notice. (ym, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
