Karen Jackson v. CBRE Inc. et al
| Karen Jackson |
| CBRE Inc., Cigna Health and Life Insurance Company and Conexis, LLC |
| 1:2017cv06239 |
| August 28, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Cook |
| Ruben Castillo |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Ruben Castillo:This case is hereby dismissed with prejudice and with each party to bear its own attorneys' fees and costs pursuant to the Stipulation #12 filed by the parties on 2/21/2019. (rao, ) |
| Filing 12 STIPULATION of Dismissal (Dore, Sean) |
| Filing 11 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Ruben Castillo: After careful review, Defendant Conexis' Motion for Clarification #9 is granted to the extent that the Court states it has not made any decision on the propriety of the removal from state court. Hearing set for 9/6/17 is stricken and no appearance is necessary. Mailed notice (ep, ) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Motion by Josephine Tung for presentment of motion to clarify #9 before Honorable Ruben Castillo on 9/6/2017 at 09:45 AM. (Tung, Josephine) |
| Filing 9 MOTION by Defendant Conexis, LLC to clarify the Court's August 29, 2017 Order (Tung, Josephine) |
| Filing 8 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Conexis, LLC by Josephine Tung (Tung, Josephine) |
| Filing 7 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Ruben Castillo: After a careful review of this recently removed state court complaint, said complaint is dismissed without prejudice to the filing of a timely notice of removal or an amended federal complaint. The parties are requested to exhaust any settlement possibilities prior to filing any further pleadings. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice (ep, ) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes the MIDP Standing Order. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (jk, ) |
| Filing 5 MAILED Notice of Removal letter to counsel of record. (jk, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Ruben Castillo. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable M. David Weisman. (daj, ) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants CBRE Inc., Cigna Health and Life Insurance Company by Daniel Keenan Ryan (Ryan, Daniel) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants CBRE Inc., Cigna Health and Life Insurance Company by Peter E. Pederson, Jr (Pederson, Peter) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Pederson, Peter) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE of Removal from Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois, case number (17-L-767905481) filed by CBRE Inc., Cigna Health and Life Insurance Company Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-13523409. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Pederson, Peter) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
