McCaskill v. Moore et al
Kisha McCaskill |
Barbara Moore, Stafford Owens, Lina Thomas, Sirlena Thomas, Christopher Clark and Paul Jackson |
1:2017cv07082 |
September 29, 2017 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Chicago Office |
Cook |
Amy J. St. Eve |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 100 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: Christopher Clark's and Paul Jackson's motions to dismiss 84 85 are granted on plaintiff's free speech retaliation claim. The court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the other cla ims against them, which are dismissed without prejudice. Barbara Moore's motion to dismiss 83 is denied on plaintiff's free speech retaliation and false light claims, and granted on the defamation and tortious interference claims. Staff ord Owens's motion to dismiss 83 is denied on plaintiff's free speech retaliation claim, and granted on all other claims. Moore and Owens' anti-SLAPP motion is denied. Moore and Owens are directed to answer Count I (free speech re taliation), and Moore is directed to answer Count IV (false light), on or before November 30, 2018. The parties are directed to submit a joint status report using this court's form on or before December 5, 2018. This matter is set for a report on status on December 11, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. Signed by the Honorable Robert W. Gettleman on 11/6/2018. Mailed notice (cn). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.