CAO Lighting, Inc. v. Light Efficient Design et al
CAO Lighting, Inc. |
Light Efficient Design and Electrical Wholesale Supply Co., Inc. |
1:2017cv07359 |
October 12, 2017 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Chicago Office |
XX US, Outside the State of IL |
Harry D. Leinenweber |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 83 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Re: Claim Construction. Signed by the Honorable Harry D. Leinenweber on 4/3/19:Mailed notice(maf) |
Filing 45 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER - IT IS ORDERED: 1. Defendants Motion to Sever, Stay, and Transfer (Dkt. 28 ) is GRANTED. The claims against Light Efficient Design are hereby severed. The Clerk is directed to transfer theclaims against Light Efficient Design to the Northern District of Illinois. All proceedings against EWS are stayed until further order of the Court.2. Plaintiffs unopposed Motion to Seal Opposition to Defendants Motion to Sever, Stay, and Transfer and Declaration of Brian E. Laht i (Dkt. 34 ) is GRANTED. 3. The Motion for Protective Order (Dkt. 23 ) is GRANTED. The Court hereby enters the Stipulated Protective Order. Signed by Judge David C. Nye. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjs) [Transferred from Idaho on 10/12/2017.] |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.