Ciarpaglini et al v. City of South Beloit Police Department et al
| Robert Ciarpaglini and Ted Shenberger |
| City of South Beloit Police Department, Dean Stiegemeier, Adam Truman, Daniel Roggenbuck, Taylor Ramsey and Tom Morrison |
| 1:2017cv07430 |
| October 13, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Winnebago |
| Iain D. Johnston |
| Frederick J. Kapala |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
24
ORDER Adopting Report and Recommendations :Before the court is a report and recommendation (R&R) 23 from the magistrate judge that thiscourt grant plaintiffs oral motion under Rule 41(a)(2) to voluntarily dismiss defendants City ofSouth Beloit Pol ice Department, Dean Stiegemeier, Sgt. Adam Truman, Daniel Roggenbuck, andTaylor Ramsey with prejudice with leave to reinstate by 1/31/2018. Accordingly, there being nowritten objection to the magistrate judges R&R, see 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b);Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149-50 (1985), and the court having reviewed the record and theR&R, the court accepts the R&R and grants plaintiffs motion. Defendants City of South BeloitPolice Department, Dean Stiegemeier, Sgt. Adam Truman, Daniel Roggenbuck, and TaylorRamsey are terminated from the case. Signed by the Honorable Frederick J. Kapala on 12/5/2017:mailed notice(pg, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
