Baskins v. Gilmore et al
| Joseph Baskins |
| Patrick Gilmore, Michael R Kelly, Marc Jarocki, City Of Chicago and Unknown Chicago Police Department Employees |
| 1:2017cv07566 |
| October 19, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Cook |
| Edmond E. Chang |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
94
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order signed by the Honorable Edmond E. Chang on 9/30/2018: For the reasons discussed in the Opinion, the City's motion 33 to dismiss is denied, although certain Monell theories are not adequately stated. The City's motion to dismiss the Cross-Complaint is denied 73 . Discovery on Monell liability will be limited to the following: (1) the code of silence that encourages officers to remain quiet about officer misconduct and to fabricate evidence and initiate ch arges against civilians to cover up the misconduct, as well as the City's knowledge of and failure to address the code of silence; and (2) the failure to discipline officers who engage in misconduct (this likely should be a subject of conferral to confine discovery to what is reasonably necessary in this case). Discovery cannot proceed on the other versions of Monell liability. On or before 10/19/2018, the parties shall file a status report proposing a discovery schedule for the Monell claim. The status hearing of 10/26/2018 remains in place. Emailed notice(eec)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
