Cage v. Harper et al
| Patrick B. Cage |
| Tiffany Harper, Nicholas Gowen, Kambium Buckner, Marshall Hatch, Sr., Horace Smith and Rachel Lindsey |
| 1:2017cv07621 |
| October 20, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Cook |
| Andrea R. Wood |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
392
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Steven C. Seeger on 4/25/2023. For the reasons stated above, Defendants' bill of costs (Dckt. No. 386 ) is reduced to account for the Court's denial of costs for expedited delivery of Pl aintiff's deposition transcript ($392.40), delivery costs for deposition transcripts ($280.00), and expedited delivery of the Board meeting transcripts ($939.97). The total amount of recoverable expenses is $22,811.49. Mailed notice. (jjr, )
|
|
Filing
379
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Steven C. Seeger on 7/16/2021. Mailed notice. (jjr, )
|
|
Filing
218
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani on 3/16/2020. Mailed notice(lxs, )
|
|
Filing
195
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani on 12/19/2019. Mailed notice(lxs, )
|
|
Filing
58
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order signed by the Honorable Andrea R. Wood on 8/30/2018. Mailed notice(ef, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
