Matlin et al v. Spin Master Corp. et al
| Tai Matlin and James Waring |
| Spin Master Corp., Spin Master Ltd., Swimways Corporation and Kelsyus, LLC |
| 1:2017cv07706 |
| October 25, 2017 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Cook |
| Virginia M. Kendall |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1330 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
73
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order signed by the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 6/10/2019. Defendants' Motion for Sanctions 48 is granted. Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint remains dismissed without prejudice. Defendants are directed to f ile a detailed accounting of the attorneys' fees and costs associated with the preparation and filing of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss 26 and Motion for Sanctions 48 within 14 days of the entry of this Order. See Order for further details. Mailed notice(lk, )
|
|
Filing
40
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order signed by the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 7/20/2018. The Court grants Defendants' Motion to Dismiss 26 for lack of personal jurisdiction without prejudice pursuant to Rule 12(b)(2). The Court further grants the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for improper venue without prejudice as well for failure to meet any one of the three provisions set forth under 28 U.S.C. §1391(b). Mailed notice(lk, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
