Mizrachi v. Ordower et al
| Joseph Mizrachi |
| Lawrence B Ordower and Ordower & Ordower, PC |
| 1:2017cv08036 |
| November 6, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Cook |
| Matthew F. Kennelly |
| Other Personal Property Damage |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
263
ORDER ON DEFENDANTS' MAY 7, 2021 MOTIONS, signed by the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly on 5/10/2021: For the reasons stated in the accompanying order, the Court grants defendants' motion to file a second amended exhibit 3A to the final pret rial order 258 ; denies their motion for clarification of the trial-time-limits order 261 but has in fact clarified it; and denies their motion to clarify or reconsider the in limine rulings and their renewed motion to stay 260 . Finally, to ret urn to a topic addressed in the first paragraph of this order, Ordower is directed to show cause why the Court should not assess trial time against him for the latter motion 260 , consistent with the terms of the trial-time-limits order. The Court proposes to assess only one hour, though this is a good deal less time than the Court spent reviewing the motion and the relevant underlying and related material. This will be addressed at the outset of the morning session on May 11. (mk)
|
|
Filing
248
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly on 5/2/2021: The Court rules on the parties' remaining motions in limine as set out in this order. The Court believes that it has now ruled on all of the matters presente d in the parties' motions in limine. Based upon the Court's exclusion, via this order, of additional evidence (including, but not limited to, the experts' respective weighing of and conclusions about what the evidence shows), all of which was done after the Court's setting of trial time limits, the Court reduces each side's trial time allocation by one hour, to a total of fifteen each, thirty total. The Court notes that it regards this as a very conservative downward adjustment given the amount of evidence excluded via the present order. (mk)
|
|
Filing
208
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly on 8/11/2020: For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion and Order, the Court grants defendants' motion for summary judgment [dkt. no. 184] in part. Th e Court concludes that Mizrachi may not recover legal expenses Mizrachi incurred against Ordower in other lawsuits (as distinguished from expenses Mizrachi incurred in connection with other parties) and that he may not recover punitive damages on eit her of his claims. The Court otherwise denies defendants' motion for summary judgment. The Court denies plaintiff's motion for summary judgment [dkt. no. 187]. The case is set for a telephone status hearing on August 20, 2020 at 8:45 a.m . to discuss the upcoming trial date and procedural and logistical matters relating to the trial. Counsel should use call-in number 888-684-8852, access code 746-1053, and they should wait for the case to be called before announcing themselves. (mk)
|
|
Filing
182
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly on 4/19/2020: For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion and Order, the Court denies defendants' motion to stay 173 . The dispositive motion filing de adline, which had been March 27, 2020 until it was extended by virtue of General Order 20-0012, as amended, is reset by the Court to May 8, 2020. This deadline is not affected by Second Amended General Order 20-0012, and it will not be affected by a ny similar general order entered hereafter. The Court will set a briefing schedule once the motions are filed. The case is set for a status hearing on May 22, 2020 at 9:30 a.m. The status hearing and motion ruling date of April 21, 2020 is vacated. The trial date of July 6, 2020 remains as-is. (mk)
|
|
Filing
69
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly on 2/25/2019: For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion and Order, the Court grants third party defendants' motion to dismiss the third party complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction 53. The remainder of the case remains set for a status hearing as scheduled on February 26, 2019. (pjg, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
