Horne v. Electric Eel Manufacturing Company, Inc. et al
| Calvin Horne |
| Electric Eel Manufacturing Company, Inc. and Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. |
| 1:2017cv08080 |
| November 8, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Cook |
| Ronald A. Guzman |
| Personal Injury- Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
205
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Ronald A. Guzman on 5/14/2019: The Court denies Calvin Horne's Rule 59(e) motion to alter or amend the judgment 191 . On defendants' petition for costs 188 , the Clerk of Court is directed to tax costs against plaintiff and in favor of defendants in the amount of $10.991.04 ($10.164.47 for deposition transcripts + $339.75 in witness fees + $486.82 in fees of the clerk). [For further details see Discussion]. Mailed notice(is, )
|
|
Filing
186
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Ronald A. Guzman on 2/12/2019: Defendant Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.'s motion for summary judgment 150 is granted. Defendant Electric Eel Manufacturing Company, Inc.'s motion for summa ry judgment 154 is granted. Judgment will be entered in favor of defendants and against plaintiff. Plaintiff's motion for sanctions and/or to bar defendants' expert 175 is denied as moot. Civil case terminated. [For further details see Memorandum Opinion and Order]. Mailed notice(is, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
