Brown et al v. Cook County et al
| Crystal Brown, Saran Crayton, Samantha Slonim, Celeste Addyman, Erika Knierim and Julie Hull |
| Cook County, Thomas Dart, Law Office of the Cook County Public Defender and Amy Campanelli |
| 1:2017cv08085 |
| November 8, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Cook |
| Matthew F. Kennelly |
| Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
218
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly on 8/12/2019: For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion and Order, the Court grants the plaintiffs' motion for class certification in part and denies it in part [dkt. no. 190]. The Court certifies the following hostile work environment class: All female assistant public defenders (not including supervisors) and law clerks who have worked for the defendants from November 1, 2015 through the present a nd who have visited the jail and/or lockup in connection with their employment. The Court appoints Robin Potter and M. Nieves Bolanos as class counsel. The Court declines, however, to certify the retaliation subclass unless the plaintiffs demonstrate that it is sufficiently numerous to satisfy Rule 23(a)(1) after the modifications to the subclass definition described above. The case is set for a status hearing on August 20, 2019 at 9:30 a.m. to set any necessary schedules for further proceedings as well as a date for the next settlement conference. (mk)
|
|
Filing
122
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly on 6/26/2018: For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion and Order, the Court denies Dart's and Campanelli's motions to dismiss the Brown plaintiffs ' first amended complaint [No. 17 C 8085, dkt. nos. 90 and 101]; denies the CCSO's motion to partially dismiss the Howard plaintiffs' first consolidated complaint [No. 17 C 8146, dkt. no. 75]; grants Cook County's motion to dismis s the Howard plaintiffs' Title VII claim (count 1) but otherwise denies the motion [No. 17 C 8146, dkt. no. 73]; grants Dart's request to strike Caloca's claims against Dart (as duplicative of the claims against the CCSO) and to strike her request for punitive damages but denies the motion to dismiss the equal protection and ICRA claims against the CCSO [No. 17 C 9056, dkt. no. 31]; and grants Cook County's motion to dismiss with respect to Caloca's equal protection claim (count 1) but denies it with respect to the indemnification claim [No. 17 C 9056, dkt. no. 29]. (mk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
