Logan v. City Of Chicago et al
| Chris Logan |
| City Of Chicago, Jeffrey Redding, Robert May, Anthony Bates, David Schmidt and Jorge Rodriguez |
| 1:2017cv08312 |
| November 16, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Cook |
| Harry D. Leinenweber |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
89
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: For the reasons stated herein, the Defendant City of Chicago's Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 62) is granted. Defendants Jeffrey Redding's, Robert May's, Anthony Bates', David Schmidt's, and Jorge Rodriguez's Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 64) is granted. Civil case terminated. Signed by the Honorable Harry D. Leinenweber on 3/25/2020:Mailed notice (maf)
|
|
Filing
35
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order. For the reasons stated herein, the Court grants in part Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. (Dkt. No. 29.) Count IV and the First Amendment claim in Count VI are dismissed without prejudice and Counts VIII and IX are dismissed with prejudice. The individual Defendants are also stricken from Count III. The case therefore proceeds on Counts I, II, III (solely against the City), VI (solely on Due Process and Equal Protection grounds), VII, and X. Status hearing set for 11/1/2018 at 09:00 AM. Signed by the Honorable Harry D. Leinenweber on 10/24/2018:Mailed notice(maf)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
