Caloca v. Cook County et al
| Diana Caloca |
| Cook County and Thomas Dart |
| 1:2017cv09056 |
| December 15, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Cook |
| Sharon Johnson Coleman |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
46
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly on 6/26/2018: For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion and Order, the Court denies Dart's and Campanelli's motions to dismiss the Brown plaintiffs ' first amended complaint [No. 17 C 8085, dkt. nos. 90 and 101]; denies the CCSO's motion to partially dismiss the Howard plaintiffs' first consolidated complaint [No. 17 C 8146, dkt. no. 75]; grants Cook County's motion to dismis s the Howard plaintiffs' Title VII claim (count 1) but otherwise denies the motion [No. 17 C 8146, dkt. no. 73]; grants Dart's request to strike Caloca's claims against Dart (as duplicative of the claims against the CCSO) and to strike her request for punitive damages but denies the motion to dismiss the equal protection and ICRA claims against the CCSO [No. 17 C 9056, dkt. no. 31]; and grants Cook County's motion to dismiss with respect to Caloca's equal protection claim (count 1) but denies it with respect to the indemnification claim [No. 17 C 9056, dkt. no. 29]. (mk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
