Rustom v. Rustom et al
Plaintiff: Maher Rustom
Defendant: Naser Rustom and Galilee Medical Center, S.C.
Case Number: 1:2017cv09061
Filed: December 17, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Office: Chicago Office
County: Cook
Presiding Judge: Marvin E. Aspen
Nature of Suit: All Other Real Property
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2409
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 27, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 145 MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER: For the reasons stated herein, the motion to dismiss 98 is granted. Case is dismissed with prejudice. Civil case terminated. Signed by the Honorable Marvin E. Aspen on 8/27/2019. Mailed notice (ags, )
August 21, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 92 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. For the foregoing reasons, Defendants' motion to dismiss is granted pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 9(b) and 12(b)(6) as to Counts I and IV and as to Count II as it pertains to an accounting of the pro perty. At this stage, the dismissal is without prejudice. Plaintiff may file an amended complaint within 14 days of the issuance of this opinion, to the extent he can do so consistent with the requirements of Rules 8 and 11. Defendants' motion f or summary judgment on Counts II and III as to the Medical Center and Open MRI is granted pursuant to Rules 12(d) and 56(a) and these claims are dismissed. It is so ordered. Status hearing date of 8/30/2018 is stricken from the Court's call. Signed by the Honorable Marvin E. Aspen on 8/21/2018. Mailed notice (ags, )
June 25, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 69 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: For the reasons in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion and Order, the plaintiff's Motion to Compel Production of Documents [Dkt. #62] is denied. Enter Memorandum Opinion and Order. Signed by the Honorable Jeffrey Cole on 6/25/2018:Mailed notice(jms, )
May 29, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 60 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Marvin E. Aspen on 5/29/2018: Plaintiff Maher Rustom's motion for leave to file a verified second amended complaint 48 is granted. Plaintiff Maher Rustom's motion for a turnover order and for an order of protection 25 and motion to compel discovery 53 are both denied. Defendants' motion to dismiss the first amended complaint 39 and motion for a protective order and order to stay discovery 55 are denied without prejudice.Mailed notice(mad, )
May 9, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 47 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Jeffrey Cole on 5/9/2018:Mailed notice(jms, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rustom v. Rustom et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Maher Rustom
Represented By: M. James Salem
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Naser Rustom
Represented By: Russell C. Green
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Galilee Medical Center, S.C.
Represented By: Russell C. Green
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?