Smith v. Stewart et al
| Nathaniel Smith |
| Jason Stewart, Paul Peterson, Tom Smith, City of Mendota and LaSalle County |
| 1:2017cv09085 |
| December 18, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Cook |
| Robert M. Dow |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
90
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Signed by the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr. on 3/10/2020. For the reasons stated above, Defendants' motion for summary judgment 55 is granted and Plaintiff's motion to dismiss 71 is denied. In view of the disposition in favor of Defendants on the merits, Defendants' motion for dismissal with prejudice as a sanction for Plaintiff's harassing and vulgar communications with defense counsel 65 is denied as moot. However, given the egregiou s and highly inappropriate nature of those communications, the Court will refer Plaintiff to the Executive Committee of the Northern District of Illinois for a determination of whether to impose filing restrictions or other sanctions and/or discipl ine on Plaintiff. Because this order resolves all of the remaining claims in the case, a final judgment will be entered under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58 in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiff and this civil case will be terminated. For further information see below. Mailed notice(cdh, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
