United States of America v. The USPS Priority Mail package bearing tracking number 9505516193417261052361, further described in Attachment A
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: The USPS Priority Mail package bearing tracking number 9505516193417261052361, further described in Attachment A
Case Number: 1:2017mc00470
Filed: September 25, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Office: Chicago Office
Presiding Judge: M. David Weisman
Nature of Suit: Other
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States of America v. The USPS Priority Mail package bearing tracking number 9505516193417261052361, further described in Attachment A
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States of America
Represented By: AUSA - Chicago
Represented By: Albert Berry, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The USPS Priority Mail package bearing tracking number 9505516193417261052361, further described in Attachment A
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?