Call One Inc. v. Lori Beth Anzine

Call One Inc. v. Lori Beth Anzine

Plaintiff:	Call One Inc.
Defendant:	Lori Beth Anzine
Case Number:	1:2018cv00124
Filed:	January 8, 2018
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Office:	Chicago Office
County:	Cook
Presiding Judge:	Matthew F. Kennelly
Nature of Suit:	Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action:	18 U.S.C. § 1836
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
June 7, 2018	Filing 90 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER, signed by the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly on 6/7/2018: For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion and Order, the Court grants Anzine's motion for summary judgment on her counterclaim [dkt. no. 24], finding the non-solicitation covenant unenforceable as written but reforming the covenant as stated in the body of this opinion. Counsel are to prepare a proposed declaratory judgment embodying the Court's decision regarding the countercla im and are to be prepared to present it at the upcoming status hearing. The Court also grants Anzine's motion for summary judgment on count 1 of the amended complaint [dkt. no. 46]. Call One's motion for leave to file additional statement s of fact is terminated as moot, as the Court has considered the matters set forth in the motion and attachments [dkt. no. 86]. The Court sets the case for a status hearing on June 11, 2018 at 8:30 a.m. The parties should be prepared to discuss at the status hearing what remains of the case and what is necessary to bring the case to a conclusion. (mk)

Date Filed

Document Text

June 7, 2018

Filing 90 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER, signed by the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly on 6/7/2018: For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion and Order, the Court grants Anzine's motion for summary judgment on her counterclaim [dkt. no. 24], finding the non-solicitation covenant unenforceable as written but reforming the covenant as stated in the body of this opinion. Counsel are to prepare a proposed declaratory judgment embodying the Court's decision regarding the countercla im and are to be prepared to present it at the upcoming status hearing. The Court also grants Anzine's motion for summary judgment on count 1 of the amended complaint [dkt. no. 46]. Call One's motion for leave to file additional statement s of fact is terminated as moot, as the Court has considered the matters set forth in the motion and attachments [dkt. no. 86]. The Court sets the case for a status hearing on June 11, 2018 at 8:30 a.m. The parties should be prepared to discuss at the status hearing what remains of the case and what is necessary to bring the case to a conclusion. (mk)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Call One Inc. v. Lori Beth Anzine
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Call One Inc.
Represented By:	Keith E Allen
Represented By:	John David Fitzpatrick
Represented By:	Bruce N. Menkes
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Lori Beth Anzine
Represented By:	Lawrence Michael Karlin
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?