Pearson v. Village of Broadview et al
| Jim Pearson |
| Village of Broadview, Sherman C Jones, David Upshaw and Village Board of Trustees Collectively As Agents |
| 1:2018cv00567 |
| January 25, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Cook |
| Thomas M. Durkin |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
80
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: For these reasons, the Court grants Defendants' motion, R. 72 , and dismisses Pearson's claims without prejudice. Should Pearson believe he can cure the deficiencies described, he may move for leave to file an amended complaint by June 1, 2020. The motion should attach a redlined comparison between the current complaint and the amended complaint and should be supported by a brief of no more than five pages describing how the proposed amended complaint w ould cure the deficiencies identified by the Court. If Pearson fails to file a motion for leave to amend or move for an extension of time in which to do so by June 1, 2020, the case will be dismissed with prejudice. Signed by the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 4/30/2020:Mailed notice(srn, )
|
|
Filing
28
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order. For the foregoing reasons, Defendants' motion to dismiss R. 14 is granted as to Count I but denied as to Count II. The Court also dismisses the Village Board of Trustees as duplicative of the Village of Broadview . Finally, the Court strikes the punitive damages allegations against the Village of Broadview. If Plaintiff believes he can cure the deficiencies identified in this opinion, he may file a motion for leave to file an amended complaint on or before Ju ly 10, 2018. The motion should attach a redlined comparison between the current complaint and the proposed amended complaint, and it should be supported by a brief of no more than five pages describing how the proposed amended complaint cures the deficiencies in the current complaint. Defendants are not to file a response unless directed to do so by the Court. Signed by the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 6/19/2018:Mailed notice(srn, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
