Hunter et al v. Wirelesspcs Chicago LLC et al
| Datisha Hunter and Latricia Hunter |
| Wirelesspcs Chicago LLC, Sky Net Wireless IL LLC, Hamad Brothers, Inc. and Mohammed Ghaben |
| 1:2018cv00980 |
| February 7, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Cook |
| Ronald A. Guzman |
| Fair Labor Standards Act |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 2 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
299
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order signed by the Honorable Beth W. Jantz on 3/23/2022: For the reasons discussed in the accompanying memorandum opinion and order, Plaintiffs' renewed motion for conditional certification and the issuance of notice 194 is granted in part and denied in part, and Defendants' motion to strike 286 is denied. An agreed motion is due by 4/6/22 for approval of an amended proposed Notice and Consent, or setting out in no more than two pages the parties' respective positions as to the form, following appropriate efforts to meet and confer (by telephone or videoconference; email will not suffice). The parties are also directed to meet and confer by 4/13/22 regarding a proposed collective discovery schedule. A Joint Status Report setting out the agreed proposed schedule, or stating the parties' respective positions on it is due by 4/20/22. All other previously ordered dates to stand. Mailed notice. (as, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
