Al Khader et al v. Tillerson et al
| Raed Al Khader and Hani Hasan Ahmad El Khader |
| Rex W Tillerson, Virginia Ramadan, Jefferson Beauregard Sessions III and Kirstjen M Nielsen |
| 1:2018cv01355 |
| February 22, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Lake |
| Robert M. Dow |
| Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 702 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
68
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Signed by the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr on 3/28/2022. This is a civil action brought by Plaintiffs Raed Al Khader ("Raed") and Hani Hasan Ahmed El Khader a/k/a Al Khader ("Hani"), pursuant to the Administrative Procedure Act ("APA"), against Defendants, Antony Blinken (U.S. Secretary of State), Martina Strong (Charge D'Affaires, Riyadh, U.S. Department of State), Alejandro Mayorkas (U.S. Secretary of Homeland Security), Mer rick Garland (U.S. Attorney General), the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, and the U.S. Department of Justice. In their Third Amended Complaint [56-1], Plaintiffs seek to compel the consular office in Saudi Arabia to return their Form I-130 Pe tition to the U.S. Citizen and Immigration Services ("USCIS") for reconsideration. Currently before the Court is Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the Third Amended Complaint.1 For the following reasons, the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss 61 is granted. A final judgment in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiffs will enter consistent with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58. Civil case terminated. Emailed notice(cdh, )
|
|
Filing
55
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Signed by the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr on 2/22/2021. Emailed notice(cdh, )
|
|
Filing
41
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order signed by the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr on 2/4/2020: For the reasons stated, Plaintiffs' motion for leave to file an amended complaint 33 is denied. Given the nature of these claims, the Court will give Plaint iffs one last opportunity to file a motion for leave to amend no later than February 24, 2020, if they believe that a claim can be stated consistent with the Court's opinions. If no motion for leave is filed by that dateor if Plaintiffs advise the Courtroom Deputy that they will not be seeking leave to amend prior to that datethe Court will enter a final and appealable judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58 and terminate this case in the district court. Mailed notice (cn).
|
|
Filing
32
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Signed by the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr. on 2/4/2019. Defendants' motion to dismiss 25 is granted. This dismissal is without prejudice to Plaintiffs' opportunity to file a timely motion for le ave to file an amended complaint by March 4, 2019, if they believe they can do so consistent with this Court's opinion and Rule 11. If no motion is filed by that date, the Court will enter an order converting the dismissal to be with prejudice and will enter a Rule 58 final judgment. Mailed notice(cdh, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
