Bland et al v. Edward D. Jones & Co., L.P. et al
| Wayne Bland, Danuta Durkiewicz, David Bowles and Adam Reyes |
| Edward D. Jones & Co., L.P. and The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P. |
| 1:2018cv01832 |
| March 13, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Cook |
| Robert M. Dow |
| Employment |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
102
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Signed by the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr. on March 30, 2020. Plaintiffs Wayne Bland, Danuta Durkiewicz, David Bowles, and Adam Reyes ("Plaintiffs") filed this putative collective and class action agains t Defendants Edward D. Jones & Co., L.P. and The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P.; alleging violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq. (Count I) and several Illinois and Missouri state laws. Currently before the Court is Defendants' motion to dismiss 83 Plaintiffs' Second Amended Class and Collective Action Complaint 79 . For the reasons stated below, Defendants' motion to dismiss 83 is granted in part and denied in part. Th e case is set for further status on May 13, 2020 at 9:00 a.m. Counsel are directed to file a joint status report, including a discovery plan and a statement of whether any settlement talks have occurred and whether the parties request an early settlement conference, no later than May 8, 2020. Mailed notice(cdh, )
|
|
Filing
68
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Signed by the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr. on 3/19/2019. Plaintiffs Wayne Bland, Danuta Durkiewicz, David Bowles and Adam Reyes ("Plaintiffs") filed this putative collective and class action on behalf of themselves and all those similarly situated against Defendants Edward D. Jones & Co., L.P. and The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P.; alleging violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq. (Count I) and several Illinois and Missouri statutes. Currently before the Court is Defendants' motion to dismiss 38 Plaintiffs' Amended Class and Collective Action Complaint 35 . For the reasons stated below, Defendants' motion to dismiss 38 is granted. Plaintiff Bowles's claims in Count I are dismissed with prejudice, except as to any claims that relate to the TCR Provision, which are dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiffs' recordkeeping claim in Count I is al so dismissed with prejudice. The rest of Count I and Counts IIVI are dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiffs are given until April 15, 2019 to file an amended complaint consistent with this opinion. The case is set for further status on April 23, 2019 at 9:00 a.m. Finally, Defendants' request for oral argument 63 is denied as moot. Mailed notice(cdh, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
