Arch Insurance Company v. PCH Healthcare Holdings, LLC et al
| Arch Insurance Company |
| PCH Healthcare Holdings, LLC, The People's Choice Hospital, LLC, PCH Management Newman, LLC, PCH Lab Services, LLC, PCH Labs, Inc., Seth Guterman, David Wanger, Aetna Inc. and Aetna Life Insurance Company |
| 1:2018cv02691 |
| April 13, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| XX US, Outside the State of IL |
| Edmond E. Chang |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
74
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order signed by the Honorable Edmond E. Chang. For the reasons stated in the Opinion, Plaintiff Arch's motion for judgment on the pleadings 34 is granted as to Counts 1, 4, and 5 of the complaint, as well as Countercl aim 1. Plaintiff Arch's motion 35 to dismiss Counterclaim 2 is also granted. The cross-motion 56 for judgment on the pleadings filed by Defendants PCH Healthcare Holdings, LLC; The Peoples Choice Hospital, LLC; PCH Management Newman, LLC; PC H Lab Services, LLC; PCH Labs, Inc.; Seth Guterman; and David Wanger is denied. A declaratory judgment will be entered for Arch declaring that there is no duty to defend the PCH Defendants against Case No. 17 C 4354, filed in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. The status hearing of 08/22/2019 is vacated. Civil case terminated. Emailed notice(slb, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
