Nordstrom Consulting, Inc. et al v. Innova Systems, Inc. et al
Nordstrom Consulting, Inc. and Steven Nordstrom |
Innova Systems, Inc. and Cheryl Nordstrom |
1:2018cv03011 |
April 27, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Chicago Office |
Cook |
Andrea R. Wood |
Copyrights |
17 U.S.C. ยง 501 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 130 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: Signed by the Honorable Jeffrey Cole on 10/7/21. Mailed notice (yt) |
Filing 117 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: For the reasons stated in the accompanying Opinion, the Court denies Defendants' Second Motion for Leave to Amend their Counterclaim 98 . Signed by the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama on 8/26/2021. Mailed notice (axc). |
Filing 97 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama on 11/6/2020: For the reasons stated in the Opinion, the Court denies Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs' motion for leave to amend the counterclaim 88 without prejudice. T he Court denies Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants' motion to strike 89 insofar as the Court construes it as Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants' response to Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs' motion for leave to amend. Any subsequent motions for leave to amend the pleadings must be filed by December 4, 2020 and explain why the movant meets Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)'s good-cause standard. Mailed notice (axc). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.