Karageorge v. Urlacher et al
| Tyna Karageorge |
| Brian Urlacher, Pamela Loza, Abbey Romanek, Howard Rosenberg, Donald Schiller, Leslie Arenson, Anita Ventrelli, Law Offices of Schiller, Ducanto & Fleck, Thomas Raines, Jeannine Miyuskovich, Robyn Walters and And Any Unknown |
| 1:2018cv03148 |
| May 2, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Cook |
| Gary Feinerman |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
74
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order written by the Honorable Gary Feinerman on 9/27/2019.Mailed notice.(jlj, )
|
|
Filing
49
Order written by the Honorable Gary Feinerman on 11/27/2018. The Clerk is directed to amend the docket in these respects: (1) substitute Robin Walton (her correct name) for Robyn Walters (not her correct name) as a party defendant; and (2) substitut e Schiller, DuCanto & Fleck, LLP (the firm's correct name) for Law Offices of Schiller, DuCanto & Fleck (not the firm's correct name) as a party defendant. For the reasons set forth below, Defendant Loza, Walton, and Romanek's motion to dismiss 28 , Defendant Rosenberg's motion to dismiss 31 , Defendant Miyuskovich's motion to dismiss 33 , and Defendant Schiller, Ventrelli, Arenson, and Schiller, DuCanto & Fleck, LLP's motion to dismiss 39 are granted. The fe deral claims against Defendants Loza, Walton, Romanek, Rosenberg, Miyuskovich, Schiller, Ventrelli, Arenson, and Schiller, DuCanto & Fleck, LLP are dismissed with prejudice under Civil Rule 12(b)(6), and the court relinquishes its supplemental jurisd iction over the state law claims against those defendants pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3). Because Plaintiff has not complied with the 10/16/2018 order 48 as to service on Defendants Urlacher and Raines, the claims against those defendants are dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Civil Rule 4(m). Defendant Loza, Romanek, and Walton's motion to stay 26 and Defendant Schiller, Ventrelli, Arenson, and Schiller, DuCanto & Fleck, LLP's motion to dismiss 38 are denied as moot. The 12/13/2018 status hearing 48 is stricken. Enter judgment order. Civil case closed.Mailed notice.(jlj, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
