Perfect Brow Art, Inc. v. Devkota et al
| Shobha Devkota, Krishna Baral, Brow Art Studio and Perfect Brow Art, Inc. |
| Brow Art Studio, Inc. |
| 1:2018cv04361 |
| June 22, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Cook |
| Elaine E Bucklo |
| Trademark |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1338 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 10, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo: Agreed upon motion for extension of time to respond to plaintiff's complaint #12 is granted to 9/10/2018. No appearance required on 8/13/2018. Mailed notice. (mgh, ) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Motion by Michele Sharon Katz for presentment of motion for extension of time to file answer #12 before Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo on 8/13/2018 at 09:30 AM. (Katz, Michele) |
| Filing 12 MOTION by Plaintiff Perfect Brow Art, Inc. for extension of time to file answer regarding complaint #1 (Katz, Michele) |
| Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Perfect Brow Art, Inc. as to Shobha Devkota on 7/20/2018, answer due 8/10/2018. (Katz, Michele) |
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Perfect Brow Art, Inc. as to Brow Art Studio, Inc. on 7/20/2018, answer due 8/10/2018. (Katz, Michele) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Perfect Brow Art, Inc. as to Krishna Baral on 7/20/2018, answer due 8/10/2018. (Katz, Michele) |
| Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo: Scheduling conference set for 9/27/2018 at 09:45 AM. Rule 26(f) report re MIDP due 9/25/2018. The report must comply with the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot program of the district court. The report form can be found on Judge Bucklo's page at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov. Mailed notice (reg) |
| Filing 7 MAILED to plaintiff(s) counsel Lanham Mediation Program materials. (kp, ) |
| Filing 6 MAILED trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA. (kp, ) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (kp, ) |
| Filing 4 EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Perfect Brow Art, Inc. regarding complaint #1 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit B, #2 Exhibit C)(Katz, Michele) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants Krishna Baral, Brow Art Studio, Inc., Shobha Devkota (jn, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable M. David Weisman. (acm) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Perfect Brow Art, Inc. by Michele Sharon Katz (Katz, Michele) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Katz, Michele) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Perfect Brow Art, Inc.; jury demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-14624886. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Katz, Michele) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
