Ruiz v. Lashbrook
| Miguel Ruiz |
| Warden Jacqueline Lashbrook and Jacqueline Lashbrook |
| 1:2018cv04429 |
| June 26, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Randolph |
| Jorge L Alonso |
| Prisoner: Habeas Corpus |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER: Petitioner's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #3 is denied. Petitioner is ordered to pay the $5.00 statutory filing fee by September 5, 2018. Failure to comply with this order may result in summary dismissal of this case. The Clerk is instructed to adjust the docket to reflect that Respondent Jacqueline Lashbrook is the Warden of the Menard Correctional Center. Signed by the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso on 8/6/2018. Mailed notice (tt, )
|
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Petitioner Miguel Ruiz by Sean William Collins-Stapleton (Collins-Stapleton, Sean) |
| Filing 3 APPLICATION by Petitioner Miguel Ruiz for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Collins-Stapleton, Sean) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Collins-Stapleton, Sean) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for writ of habeas corpus filed by Miguel Ruiz against Jacqueline Lashbrook (Collins-Stapleton, Sean) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable M. David Weisman. (acm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
