Howard v. Defratis et al
Lewana Howard |
Janice Glenn, Grabriel Defratis and Linda C. Williams |
1:2018cv04430 |
June 26, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Chicago Office |
Cook |
Andrea R Wood |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 15, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Janice Glenn on 7/17/2018, answer due 8/7/2018. (aee, ) |
Filing 15 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Grabriel Defratis on 7/17/2018, answer due 8/7/2018. (aee, ) |
Filing 14 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Linda C. Williams on 7/17/2018, answer due 8/7/2018. (aee, ) |
Filing 13 AMENDED complaint by Lewana Howard against All Defendants. (aee, ) |
Filing 12 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Lewana Howard for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (aee, ) |
Filing 11 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Andrea R. Wood: Motion hearing held. Counsel for Defendant appeared and Plaintiff Lewana Howard appeared pro se. Pursuant to the discussion held in open court, by 8/15/2018, Plaintiff is directed to submit an in forma pauperis application (i.e., financial affidavit) for the Court's review. Defendants' motion for extension of time to answer #9 is taken under advisement. Initial status hearing set for 8/29/2018 #7 remains firm. Mailed notice (ef, ) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Motion by Sarah Hughes Newman for presentment of motion for extension of time to file answer #9 before Honorable Andrea R. Wood on 8/8/2018 at 09:00 AM. (Newman, Sarah) |
Filing 9 MOTION by Defendants Grabriel Defratis, Janice Glenn, Linda C. Williams for extension of time to file answer regarding complaint #1 (Newman, Sarah) |
Filing 8 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Grabriel Defratis, Janice Glenn, Linda C. Williams by Sarah Hughes Newman (Newman, Sarah) |
Filing 7 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Andrea R. Wood: Initial status hearing set for 8/29/2018 at 9:00 AM. The parties are directed to meet and conduct a planning conference pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f). At least seven days before the initial status hearing, the parties shall file a joint written status report, not to exceed five pages in length. The initial status report shall provide the information described on the Court's website at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov under District Judges, Judge Andrea R. Wood, Initial Status Conference. Mailed notice (ef, ) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (jh, ) |
Filing 4 MOTION by Plaintiff Lewana Howard for attorney representation. (Exhibit) (jh, ) |
Filing 3 PRO SE Appearance by Plaintiff Lewana Howard. (jh, ) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet. (jh, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Lewana Howard. (jh, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.