Principal Life Insurance Company v. Noble et al
| Principal Life Insurance Company |
| Domingo Contreras, Jr., individually, and as natural guardian and next of kin of L.N.C. and S.N.C., Estate of Deborah S.A. Noble, Andy Noble Contreras, Siegfried L. Noble and Domingo Contreras, Jr. |
| 1:2018cv04576 |
| July 2, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| XX US, Outside the State of IL |
| Sharon Johnson Coleman |
| Contract: Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 11, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Kersting, Edna) |
| Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Principal Life Insurance Company by Edna Sybil Kersting (Kersting, Edna) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Interpleader and Other Equitable Relief filed by Principal Life Insurance Company; Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-14656663. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (Policy), #2 Exhibit B (beneficiary designation), #3 Exhibit C (death certificate), #4 Exhibit D (Life claim statements), #5 Exhibit E (Divorce decree), #6 Exhibit F (December 22, 2017 correspondence), #7 Exhibit G (Alisa Levin April 23, 2018 email))(Kersting, Edna) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Michael T. Mason. (dal, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
