Internet Media Interactive Corp. v. The Boeing Company
Internet Media Interactive Corporation and Internet Media Interactive Corp. |
The Boeing Company |
1:2018cv04579 |
July 2, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Chicago Office |
Cook |
Charles P Kocoras |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 2, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Internet Media Interactive Corporation by Timothy J. Haller (Haller, Timothy) |
Filing 5 Plaintiff's Local Rule 3.4 Notice of Claims Involving Patent by Internet Media Interactive Corporation (Haller, Timothy) |
Filing 4 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Internet Media Interactive Corporation (Haller, Timothy) |
Filing 3 Report On The Filing Or Determination Of An Action Regarding A Patent Or Trademark by Internet Media Interactive Corporation (Haller, Timothy) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Haller, Timothy) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Internet Media Interactive Corporation; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-14657042. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Haller, Timothy) |
SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant The Boeing Company (dal, ) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Charles P. Kocoras. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable M. David Weisman. (dal, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.