West Bend Mutual Insuance Company v. Martinez et al
| West Bend Mutual Insuance Company |
| Jose Esparza, Maria Becerra, A Affordable Tree Service, Melchor Martinez and J. E. |
| 1:2018cv04671 |
| July 6, 2018 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| XX US, Outside the State of IL |
| Edmond E Chang |
| Iain D Johnston |
| Frederick J Kapala |
| Contract: Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 6, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff West Bend Mutual Insuance Company by Kelly Elizabeth Purkey (Purkey, Kelly) (Main Document 4 replaced on 8/22/2018) (yxp, ). |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff West Bend Mutual Insuance Company by Thomas Francis Lucas (Lucas, Thomas) (Main Document 3 replaced on 8/22/2018) (yxp, ). |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Lucas, Thomas) (Main Document 2 replaced on 8/22/2018) (yxp, ). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Declaratory Judgment filed by West Bend Mutual Insuance Company; Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-14670796.(Lucas, Thomas) (Main Document 1 replaced on 8/22/2018) (yxp, ). (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/22/2018: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B) (yxp, ). |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Edmond E. Chang. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sheila M. Finnegan. (ec, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.