Cosmetic Warriors Limited v. Luscious Group LLC et al
Plaintiff: Cosmetic Warriors Limited
Defendant: Innovative Technologies PVT d/b/a Luscious Cosmetics and Luscious Group LLC
Case Number: 1:2018cv04803
Filed: July 13, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Office: Chicago Office
County: Cook
Presiding Judge: Sharon Johnson Coleman
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 6, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 6, 2018 Filing 13 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman: Plaintiff's consent motion to reschedule status hearing #11 is granted. No appearance necessary on 9/11/2018. Status hearing set for 9/14/2018 is stricken and reset to 10/15/2018 at 9:00 AM. Mailed notice. (ym, )
September 5, 2018 Filing 12 NOTICE of Motion by Robert Douglas Leighton for presentment of motion for miscellaneous relief #11 before Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman on 9/11/2018 at 08:45 AM. (Leighton, Robert)
September 5, 2018 Filing 11 MOTION by Plaintiff Cosmetic Warriors Limited( Consent Motion to Reschedule Status Hearing ) (Leighton, Robert)
August 2, 2018 Filing 10 CERTIFICATE of COMPLIANCE re Court's July 16, 2018 Letter (Leighton, Robert)
July 23, 2018 Filing 9 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman: This case has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Sharon Johnson Coleman. Plaintiff is directed to advise the defendants of the status hearing forthwith. The parties are reminded that responsive pleadings must comply with section A(3) of this Court's Standing Order Regarding the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project. Status hearing set for 9/14/2018 at 9:00 AM. The parties are directed to meet and discuss the status of the case. The parties are to file a joint status report in the format described on the court's website at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov at least 3 business days prior to the status. The parties are directed to discuss settlement, and whether they consent to proceed before the Magistrate Judge. The Court encourages the parties to review this court's website for its standing orders prior to contacting chambers. In the event that the defendant files a motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b), the defendant is granted leave to notice that motion for presentment at the date and time of the status hearing. Mailed notice. (ym, )
July 16, 2018 Filing 8 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (yap, )
July 16, 2018 Filing 7 EMAILED to plaintiff(s) counsel Lanham Mediation Program materials. (yap, )
July 16, 2018 Filing 6 EMAILED Trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA (Attachments: #1 Attachment, #2 Attachment, #3 Attachment, #4 Attachment, #5 Attachment, #6 Attachment, #7 Attachment, #8 Attachment, #9 Attachment, #10 Attachment). (yap, )
July 13, 2018 Filing 5 Report on the Filing or Determination of an Action Regarding a Patent or Trademark (Form AO 120) by Cosmetic Warriors Limited (Leighton, Robert)
July 13, 2018 Filing 4 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Cosmetic Warriors Limited (Leighton, Robert)
July 13, 2018 Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Cosmetic Warriors Limited by Robert Douglas Leighton (Leighton, Robert)
July 13, 2018 Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Leighton, Robert)
July 13, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Cosmetic Warriors Limited; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-14697374. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J)(Leighton, Robert).
July 13, 2018 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sidney I. Schenkier. (dal, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cosmetic Warriors Limited v. Luscious Group LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cosmetic Warriors Limited
Represented By: Robert Douglas Leighton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Innovative Technologies PVT d/b/a Luscious Cosmetics
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Luscious Group LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?