Williams v. Fox et al
HeleneReRe T. Williams |
Malden Arms Apartment II, Catholic Charities, Kristina Fox, IDES, Chicago Park District, Howard, IL, Mercy Housing, Mary Harth and IDEZ |
1:2018cv04814 |
July 13, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Chicago Office |
Cook |
Robert M Dow |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1331 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 4, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 24 NEW EXHIBIT by Plaintiff HeleneReRe T. Williams. (kp, ) |
Filing 23 EXHIBIT /Update by Plaintiff HeleneReRe T. Williams. (kp, ) |
Filing 22 STATUS Update by HeleneReRe T. Williams for the Williams vs. Fox et al case. (kp, ) |
Filing 21 STATUS Update by HeleneReRe T. Williams for the Fox et al case. (kp, ) |
Filing 20 EXHIBIT by Plaintiff HeleneReRe T. Williams regarding #17 . (kp, ) |
Filing 19 EXHIBIT by Plaintiff HeleneReRe T. Williams (ks, ) |
Filing 18 EXHIBIT by Plaintiff HeleneReRe T. Williams. (ks, ) |
Filing 16 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr: Notice of motion date of 8/7/2018 is stricken and no appearances are necessary. For further details see the Court's Order entered on 7/27/2018 [Dkt. 13]. Mailed notice (cdh, ) |
Filing 17 AMENDED complaint by HeleneReRe T. Williams against All Defendants ("EXHIBITS"). (ks, ) |
Filing 15 EXHIBIT by Plaintiff HeleneReRe T. Williams. (ks, ) |
Filing 14 EXHIBIT by Plaintiff HeleneReRe T. Williams (ks, ) |
Filing 13 ORDER: Plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #4 is granted. However, summons shall not issue at this time. Plaintiff's complaint #1 is dismissed for failure to state a claim, for the reasons explained below. Plaintiff is given until August 28, 2018 to file an amended complaint, if she is able to do so consistent with this opinion. Plaintiff's motion for attorney representation #5 is denied without prejudice. Signed by the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr on 7/27/2018. Mailed notice(ks, ) |
Filing 12 EXHIBITS by Plaintiff HeleneReRe T. Williams. (aee, ) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Motion by HeleneReRe T. Williams for presentment of before Honorable Robert M. Dow Jr. on 8/7/2018 at 09:15 AM. (aee, ) |
Filing 10 EXHIBITS by Plaintiff HeleneReRe T. Williams. (aee, ) |
Filing 9 EXHIBITS by Plaintiff HeleneReRe T. Williams. (jh, ) |
Filing 8 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (ks, ) |
Filing 5 MOTION by Plaintiff HeleneReRe T. Williams for attorney representation. (ks, ) |
Filing 4 APPLICATION by Plaintiff HeleneReRe T. Williams for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (ks, ) |
Filing 3 PRO SE Appearance by Plaintiff HeleneReRe T. Williams (ks, ) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (ks, ) |
Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and Five copies by HeleneReRe T. Williams. (ks, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.