Osmolski v. Walsh Construction Company et al
Karen Osmolski |
City Of Chicago, Walsh Construction Company II, LLC and Walsh Construction Company |
1:2018cv04889 |
July 17, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Chicago Office |
Will |
Edmond E Chang |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1331 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 13, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 20 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: In light of the fully briefed motion #10 to remand, the status hearing of 09/14/2018 is reset to 10/26/2018 at 8:30 a.m.Emailed notice (slb, ) |
Filing 19 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: In light of the Court's trial schedule, the status hearing of 08/30/2018 is reset to 09/14/2018 at 8:45 AM.Emailed notice (slb, ) |
Filing 18 MAIL RETURNED, for document #13 sent to Philip P. Terrazzino returned as undeliverable, return to sender. Re-mailed to Tomasik Kotin Kasserman, LLC, at 161 North Clark Street Suite 3050 Chicago, IL 60601. (yap, ) |
Filing 17 RESPONSE by Karen Osmolskiin Support of MOTION by Plaintiff Karen Osmolski to remand #10 (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(McKay, James) |
Filing 16 NOTICE by Walsh Construction Company re response in opposition to motion #15 (Miller, Christopher) |
Filing 15 RESPONSE by Walsh Construction Companyin Opposition to MOTION by Plaintiff Karen Osmolski to remand #10 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Miller, Christopher) |
Filing 14 MAIL RETURNED for document #8 sent to Philip P Terrazzino returned as undeliverable, return to sender. Attorney contacted and directed to file a Notification of Change of Address with the Clerk's Office. Re-mailed to 161 N. Clark Street Suite 3050 Chicago, IL 60601. (sxb, ) |
Filing 13 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: With regard to Plaintiff's motion #10 to remand, the Court did have similar questions when reviewing the Second Amended Complaint and planned to raise the jurisdictional issue at the initial status hearing. Now that the remand motion #10 has been filed, however, Defendants shall respond to the remand motion by 08/03/2018. Plaintiff's reply due by 08/10/2018. The dismissal motion #6 briefing schedule is vacated for now. On the motion #11 for sanctions, because the removal was filed on 07/17/2018, by definition the 21-day waiting period cannot possibly be satisfied yet. Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(c)(2). So the motion #11 is denied without prejudice. But the 07/19/2018 date of filing (the filing itself was improper per Rule 11(c)(2)) is now deemed to be the waiting period start-date under Rule 11(c)(2). The Court also notes that if the remand motion is granted, or the removal notice withdrawn, it might be that the proper place to ask for sanctions is the state court, which will have a much better sense of the trial preparation. The status hearing of 07/25/2018 is reset to 08/30/2018 at 10:30 a.m., and the joint initial status report requirement is vacated for now. Emailed notice (slb, ) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Motion by James Patrick McKay, Jr for presentment of motion to remand #10 , motion for sanctions #11 before Honorable Edmond E. Chang on 7/23/2018 at 08:30 AM. (McKay, James) |
Filing 11 MOTION by Plaintiff Karen Osmolski for sanctions (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit)(McKay, James) |
Filing 10 MOTION by Plaintiff Karen Osmolski to remand (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit)(McKay, James) |
Filing 9 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Karen Osmolski by James Patrick McKay, Jr (Attachments: #1 Notice of Filing)(McKay, James) |
Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: The 07/23/23018 notice on Defendants' motion to dismiss #6 the ADA claim is vacated, and the Court will set a briefing schedule at the initial status hearing. The initial status hearing is set for 07/25/2018 at 9:30 a.m., with the joint initial status report due on 07/23/2018.Emailed notice (Attachments: #1 Status Report Requirements) (slb, ) |
Filing 7 (Contested) NOTICE of Motion by Christopher T. Miller for presentment of motion to dismiss #6 before Honorable Edmond E. Chang on 7/23/2018 at 08:30 AM. (Miller, Christopher) |
Filing 6 MOTION by Defendants City Of Chicago, Walsh Construction Company to dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Miller, Christopher) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (sxb, ) |
Filing 4 MAILED Notice of Removal letter to counsel of record. (sxb, ) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Edmond E. Chang. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey Cole. (ec, ) |
Filing 3 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Miller, Christopher) |
Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants City Of Chicago, Walsh Construction Company II, LLC by Christopher T. Miller (Miller, Christopher) |
Filing 1 NOTICE of Removal from Cook County, case number (2015 L 010343) filed by City Of Chicago, Walsh Construction Company II, LLC Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-14710739. (Miller, Christopher) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.