Cohan v. Ralph Lauren Lifestyles Concepts, LLC
Howard Cohan |
Ralph Lauren Lifestyles Concepts, LLC |
1:2018cv04898 |
July 18, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Chicago Office |
XX US, Outside the State of IL |
Joan H Lefkow |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 13, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Joan H. Lefkow: Defendant's motion for extension of time #9 is granted. Defendant shall answer or otherwise plead to the complaint by 10/15/2018. Status hearing set for 9/18/2018 is stricken and reset to 10/23/2018 at 11:00 a.m. Mailed notice (ags, ) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Motion by John Thomas Roache for presentment of extension of time #9 before Honorable Joan H. Lefkow on 9/19/2018 at 09:30 AM. (Roache, John) |
Filing 9 MOTION by Defendant Ralph Lauren Lifestyles Concepts, LLC for extension of time Second Agreed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Plead in Response to Plaintiff's Complaint (Roache, John) |
Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Joan H. Lefkow: Defendant's motion for extension of time to answer complaint #6 is granted. Defendant shall have until 9/14/2018 to respond to Complaint. Status hearing is set for 9/18/2018 at 11:00 a.m. Mailed notice (ags, ) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Motion by John Thomas Roache for presentment of motion for extension of time to file answer #6 before Honorable Joan H. Lefkow on 8/15/2018 at 09:30 AM. (Roache, John) |
Filing 6 MOTION by Defendant Ralph Lauren Lifestyles Concepts, LLC for extension of time to file answer regarding complaint #1 (Agreed Motion) (Roache, John) |
Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Ralph Lauren Lifestyles Concepts, LLC by John Thomas Roache (Roache, John) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Howard Cohan as to Ralph Lauren Lifestyles Concepts, LLC on 7/24/2018, answer due 8/14/2018. (Burt, Marshall) |
SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Ralph Lauren Lifestyles Concepts, LLC. (acm) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Howard Cohan by Marshall J. Burt (Burt, Marshall) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Burt, Marshall) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Howard Cohan; Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-14712792. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Receipt)(Burt, Marshall) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Joan H. Lefkow. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Young B. Kim. (acm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Cohan v. Ralph Lauren Lifestyles Concepts, LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Howard Cohan | |
Represented By: | Marshall J. Burt |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Ralph Lauren Lifestyles Concepts, LLC | |
Represented By: | John Thomas Roache |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.