Arcos v. Liberty Power Corporation
| Laritza M. Arcos |
| Liberty Power Corporation |
| 1:2018cv04914 |
| July 18, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Cook |
| Robert W Gettleman |
| Consumer Credit |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 12, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Motion by Shane Donovan Valenzi for presentment of motion for extension of time to file answer #11 before Honorable Robert W. Gettleman on 9/18/2018 at 09:30 AM. (Valenzi, Shane) |
| Filing 11 MOTION by Defendant Liberty Power Corporation for extension of time to file answer (Valenzi, Shane) |
| Filing 10 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Robert W. Gettleman: Defendant's unopposed motion #8 for extension of time to 9/13/2018 to file its responsive pleading is granted. Mailed notice (cn). |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Motion by Shane Donovan Valenzi for presentment of motion for extension of time to file answer #8 before Honorable Robert W. Gettleman on 8/21/2018 at 09:15 AM. (Valenzi, Shane) |
| Filing 8 MOTION by Defendant Liberty Power Corporation for extension of time to file answer regarding complaint #1 (Valenzi, Shane) |
| Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Liberty Power Corporation by Shane Donovan Valenzi (Valenzi, Shane) |
| Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Liberty Power Corporation by Xiaoyin Cao (Cao, Xiaoyin) |
| Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Liberty Power Corporation by Carmen David Caruso (Caruso, Carmen) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Laritza M. Arcos as to Liberty Power Corporation on 7/25/2018, answer due 8/15/2018. (Davidson, Joseph) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Liberty Power Corporation (yt) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Robert W. Gettleman. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Young B. Kim. (acm) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Laritza M. Arcos by Mohammed Omar Badwan (Badwan, Mohammed) |
| Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Laritza M. Arcos by Joseph Scott Davidson (Davidson, Joseph) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Laritza M. Arcos; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-14716430. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Davidson, Joseph) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Arcos v. Liberty Power Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Liberty Power Corporation | |
| Represented By: | Carmen David Caruso |
| Represented By: | Shane Donovan Valenzi |
| Represented By: | Xiaoyin Cao |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Laritza M. Arcos | |
| Represented By: | Mohammed Omar Badwan |
| Represented By: | Joseph Scott Davidson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
