Gajos v. Social Security Administration
Chestine Gajos |
Social Security Administration |
1:2018cv04980 |
July 20, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Chicago Office |
Cook |
Robert M Dow |
John J Tharp |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Chestine Gajos by David Jonathan Welch (Welch, David) |
Filing 12 ORDER: On August 20, 2018, the Court granted Plaintiff's motion for attorney representation. [10.] Accordingly, the Court requests that David Jonathan Welch; Swanson, Martin & Bell, LLP; 330 N. Wabash Ave., Suite 3300, Chicago, Illinois, 60611;(312) 766-0051, dwelch@smbtrials.com, accept the Court's invitation to represent Plaintiff in accordance with counsel's trial bar obligations under the District Court's Local Rule 83.37 (N.D. Ill.). The Court further requests that Mr. Kline file his appearance as soon as possible and that he contact Plaintiff. This case is set for further status hearing on October 23, 2018 at 9:00 a.m. Signed by the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr on 8/21/2018. Mailed notice (cc, ) |
Filing 11 COMPLAINT filed by Chestine Gajos. (kp, ) |
Filing 10 ORDER: Before the Court are Plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #4 , and Plaintiff's motion for attorney representation #5 . For the reasons stated below, the Court grants Plaintiff]s motions [ #4 ; #5 ]. The Court will provide the name of recruited counsel in a separate minute order and counsel will contact Plaintiff and defense counsel in due course. Signed by the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr on 8/20/2018. Mailed notice. (kp, ) |
Filing 9 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ORDER: Case reassigned to the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr for all further proceedings pursuant to 40.3(b)(2). Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Executive Committee on 7/25/2018. (bg, ) |
Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr: This case is referred to the Executive Committee for reassignment pursuant to Local Rule 40.3(c). Mailed notice (air, ) |
Filing 5 MOTION by Plaintiff Chestine Gajos for attorney representation. (ew, ) |
Filing 4 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Chestine Gajos for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (ew, ) |
Filing 3 PRO SE Appearance by Plaintiff Chestine Gajos. (ew, ) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet. (ew, ) |
Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and three copies by Chestine Gajos. (ew, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Gajos v. Social Security Administration | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Social Security Administration | |
Represented By: | AUSA-SSA |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Chestine Gajos | |
Represented By: | David Jonathan Welch |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.